A trauma patient who fell 20 feet from a balcony is alert with warm, dry skin but hypotensive; the upper extremities are cool, pale, and diaphoretic. Which injury should be suspected?

Prepare for the Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) exam. Access diverse quizzes and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and comprehensive explanations. Enhance your readiness and confidence for the PHTLS certification exam!

Multiple Choice

A trauma patient who fell 20 feet from a balcony is alert with warm, dry skin but hypotensive; the upper extremities are cool, pale, and diaphoretic. Which injury should be suspected?

The key idea is how shock presents in the skin and perfusion patterns after trauma. Neurogenic (spinal) shock from an injury to the spinal cord causes loss of sympathetic vascular tone below the level of injury. That loss leads to widespread vasodilation and hypotension, with the skin often warm and dry because blood is not being shunted through constricted vessels. In this scenario, a fall from height with hypotension and warm, dry skin fits that distributive/shock pattern more than it fits hemorrhagic shock, where you’d expect cool, clammy skin from peripheral vasoconstriction. The fact that the patient remains alert supports a spinal mechanism rather than a massive chest or abdominal bleed, and the overall pattern favors neurogenic shock from spinal injury. While the upper extremities are described as cool and diaphoretic, this detail doesn’t override the predominant finding of warm, dry skin with hypotension, which is the hallmark clue pointing to spinal cord injury. If the injuries listed were liver laceration or fractured pelvis, those typically produce hypovolemic shock signs—cool, pale, clammy skin from blood loss. Aortic dissection would present with different symptoms like tearing chest pain and pulse deficits. So the presentation best aligns with spinal cord injury causing neurogenic shock.

The key idea is how shock presents in the skin and perfusion patterns after trauma. Neurogenic (spinal) shock from an injury to the spinal cord causes loss of sympathetic vascular tone below the level of injury. That loss leads to widespread vasodilation and hypotension, with the skin often warm and dry because blood is not being shunted through constricted vessels. In this scenario, a fall from height with hypotension and warm, dry skin fits that distributive/shock pattern more than it fits hemorrhagic shock, where you’d expect cool, clammy skin from peripheral vasoconstriction.

The fact that the patient remains alert supports a spinal mechanism rather than a massive chest or abdominal bleed, and the overall pattern favors neurogenic shock from spinal injury. While the upper extremities are described as cool and diaphoretic, this detail doesn’t override the predominant finding of warm, dry skin with hypotension, which is the hallmark clue pointing to spinal cord injury.

If the injuries listed were liver laceration or fractured pelvis, those typically produce hypovolemic shock signs—cool, pale, clammy skin from blood loss. Aortic dissection would present with different symptoms like tearing chest pain and pulse deficits. So the presentation best aligns with spinal cord injury causing neurogenic shock.

More practice questions